Department Banner

Institutional Learning Outcome Assessments


ILO Assessment Reports

For ILOs approved by Academic Senate in 2007 and 2010


ILO 1 - Content Knowledge - Assessment Results (Assessed Spring 2014)


ILO 2 - Communication and Comprehension - Assessment Results (Assessed Fall 2010) 


ILO 3 - Critical, Creative, and Analytical Thinking - Assessment Results (Assessed Spring 2011) 


ILO 4 - Professional and Personal Growth - Assessment Results (Spring 2012)


ILO 5 - Community and Collaboration - Assessment Results (Fall 2012)


ILO 6 - Information and Technology Literacy - Assessment Results (Spring 2013)


Assessment of Learning Committee ILO Asessment Process

Since its inception, the Assessment of Learning Committee (ALC)  worked as a 25-member body to design, develop, and implement Institutional Learning Outcomes (ILO)  assessments at the College.  Lengthy discussions related to ILOs are the major focus of many meetings. 

After evaluating the results of the initial assessments (faculty and student surveys), the ALC made the following conclusions:

  1. The current method of assessment was not the most effective method for gathering authentic data that relates to student learning and how faculty can  improve it
  2. The ALC could utilize its general meeting times more effectively. 

In order to improve the assessment process, the ALC decided to  form ILO subgroups or “Expert Groups” of ALC members and faculty /staff from the campus at large to spearhead  each ILO assessment.  The premise was that this group would have the background and expertise associated with the particular ILO and would be able to work more efficiently as a smaller task force.  Although the Expert Groups were required to keep the ALC informed of its actions, it would allow the ALC to focus on additional important issues related to the overall SLO and PLO assessment processes on campus.

In Spring 2013, the first ILO Expert Group successfully completed the assessment of ILO 6 - Information and Technology Literacy.  The methodology and results of this assessment will be utilized moving forward with the revised ILO statements approved by the Academic Senate in May 2014..


ILO Alignment Process

A comprehensive re-mapping of SLOs, PLOs, and ILOs will take place in early fall 2014.

During Spring Flex Day 2010, the college faculty mapped their courses and programs to the College's institutional learning outcomes (ILOs). Using a scale of 1-4 (1 = least important and 4 = very important) faculty were asked to rate how strongly each ILO was related to each of the program's courses. By doing this, the College has been able to assess the first three ILOs by focusing on courses that are very important to the institutional learning outcome.

The completed alignments are below organized by division.

  • Behavior Social Sciences (American Studies, Anthropology, Child Development, Economics, Education/Liberal Studies, Ethnic Studies, Global Studies, History, Human Development, Philosophy, Political Science, Psychology, Sociology, Women's Studies)
  • Business (Business, Computer Information System, Law, Real Estate)
  • Fine Arts (Art, Communication Studies, Dance, Film Video, Music, Photography, Theater)
  • Health Science and Athletics (Kinesiology Athletics, Kinesiology Fitness/Wellness, Kinesiology Theory, Nursing, Radiological Technology, Recreation, Respiratory Care, SRC/Adapted Physical Education, Sign Language/Interpreter Training)
  • Humanities (Academic Strategies, English, ESL, Foreign Language, Journalism)
  • Industry and Technology (Administration of Justice, Air Conditioning and Refrigeration, Architecture, Auto Collision Repair/Painting, Automation, Robotics, and Manufacturing, Automotive Technology, Computer Aided Design/Drafting, Construction Technology, Cosmetology, Electronics and Computer Hardware Technology, Fashion, Fire and Emergency Technology, Welding)
  • Natural Sciences (Astronomy, Biology, Chemistry, Earth Sciences, Health Sciences, Horticulture, Physics)


 Last Published 3/27/15